"buying a stairway"

to progress. 
Newtown Speech ?
"but in the long run"

Apologies for the awkward segue.
I have been to La La land and Phoenix and
it is good to be home, but not back to normal.

 ***

(fn*) tba 2nd line: figures of speech
[Bold emphasis, italics de-emphasis.]

* [12-18-12:  I temporarily withdrew this post, due to concerns it contained unintended material or illusions.  I return the post without further consideration.  i.e. having confidence in the bold and NFRY the rest.  More or less so.]
[Quantum Leap ?!? **]  
** A.-B.  
*** my photo inserted last

Para-model

I will begin at the end, or rather the present.
Less than two paragraphs in:
What's Left of the Left. Why do I begin at that moment? Allow me to begin again at this moment.
What is Left of the Left?
(the lede of the link)(4)***
Is this a geometric or quantitative heading?
What is not right about the left?
Or how much of the left is still there?

Now if I may do a Hansel and Gretel impersonation...my point is that I have worked out my path off-blog. i.e. left some pebbles to attempt to trace my path.
The reality is that I got the article from** MSNBC*, (current lede) Actually I got the link not the article. So I am still working it out, but will now save my Para-model.doc with this.

* actual clip here later
**anachronistic conundrum(or appropriate con un drum)[Cain beating the media.(1)]
*** post save doc: golf term "four"/Mulligan?

[Now I must note that I will square [bracket(#)] and or continue after reading more.]
[I should now note that I have left open a blog I was editing, which has now been inserted in my Para-model.doc ala my Hansel and Gretal MO. Apparently the pebbles were bread crumbs, but in reading What is Left of the Left, noticing that I have read only one of seven pages, I must MoveOn for the time being.]
[Now... actually just moments after the last bracket I will make a point.(see **(1) On what the heck is Cain doing? He is working the model of the media, in a fourth branch sort of way. He is getting attention, and I will sort out that fourth dimension. And I must note I am impressed with Joe the Plumber and Rupert the Survivor as candidates of a third kind. Not to call them, "Out There". But I think there is something to the polarity and needing more perspectives than our parties and branches provide. And this is reflected in a mechanics and dynamics, that is not just two dimensional. But Steven Jobs did point out to Rupert Murdoch that it can be either constructive or destructive. It is not about left or right, up or down, or forward or back again. It is about making progress or not. Everything else is how, and by and for whom? Does any of this embedded here or in my saved doc, explain: that the more radical a comment the more coverage it gets? It might depend on if one is Leaning Forward or Fair and Balanced. Now, I know that there is some perspectivism here, but Fair and Balanced does not mean two dimensional. Now it just depends on if I am talking about the Media or Faux News.]
[My apologies for my Quantum Leap over the Big Cheese, I feel my bread crumbs may be safe in draft see image.]


[Andrea Mitchell: Why has the president waited? Because he wanted congress to do their job! That was my preemptive answer to the preemptive question. Meaning, I was expecting the question and anticipated the answer, which just may be in the unfinished heading: What is Left of the Left.(No question mark or exclaimation mark?)]
[Speaking of Hands or Thumbs: L-curve anyone?]


[My para-model.doc is a bibliograpy of sorts(pun intended). Some Late Entries.: not to mention blog searches for con+scious, con+science, anarchy, tyranny, and thumb and buffet.]
[For the record Searches @thumb= Star Chamber/Big Cheese/Para-Model/Obama Doctrine/Who are they calling?. @buffet= Para-model/Big Cheese/From GOP to NOP/Brackets and Debt Clock/N-oddly Enough/All Politics is Local/Commander in Chief/Off the Cliff/Irony versus Hypocrisy. By this I am recording what the Al Gore Rythms find, just in case something changes.]
[This is bleapin' freaky considering my heading and intention here: The last of my late entries, and the last thing(or link) in my para-model.doc is this and (THIS)is the first thing Ed Schultz is talking about when I turn on his show. QED? Not to mention the rest of his show, which is yet to run(he is going on about Romney in Ohio? and a clear plan, and Democrats losing the message war, then Bernie Sanders and the NYtimes poll?), but is actually digitally delayed for local radio.]

Still going? QED?]

More on "levels".

There was the "Third Way".
Then there is the "Tetrahedron".
We are talking "dimentionalism".
Not just to pun on "mention"alism, but maybe to point to Nominalism.
There is the left and the right and the partisan ship.
The point is that the answer may not be directly between them.
Even with three or four points, where is the answer?
Sanders and Trump "followers" reflect the point that it is not in the middle.

Then there is the quantum leap of "divided government" where partisanship is not the point.
It is that there are three (equal but separate"~") branches. 

With these in mind, the 5th "is out there".  Now that is almost a pun on an amendment.
If the left, right and middle were on an even plane, the fourth might be what might makes.
That might be the direction that followers think right.
Certainly Sanders and Trump don't have the same point, let alone the same plane.

Fn: for "levels" see "Thought Experiment".
Note: the partisan ship of power and the lemon plank.
Then there is the force of laws.

[6 - 3 - 16]

6-2-16
Zombie Run Fold Perspectivism